In late 2023, the CDC noticed elevated levels of lead in a number of children in the U.S. Lead has long been known as a dangerous heavy metal, especially during early childhood development.
Concern led to an investigation, which concluded the culprit was tainted cinnamon in three popular brands of applesauce products, and an FDA/CDC investigation uncovered that it was introduced via cinnamon that contained lead chromate purchased from an overseas supplier that was not required to test for heavy metals. As of March 2024, over 460 children spread across 44 states were identified as being potential victims.
It's a tragic story; one that's becoming unfortunately more common as supply chains stretch further from the FDA's oversight. Leaders at the FDA believe that lead chromate was added intentionally; it has historically been used as an additive in certain spices to increase weight, color, and profitability. Food fraud is rising, and food fraud prevention is increasingly becoming a global priority.
In the United States, food fraud, or more technically "economically motivated adulteration" (EMA), is considered to be the "fraudulent, intentional substitution or addition of a substance in a product for the purpose of increasing the apparent value of the product or reducing the cost of its production, i.e., for economic gain," per a working definition proposed by the FDA in 2009.
While there is no specific regulatory definition of EMA, it falls within the scope of 21 U.S.C. § 342, the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act dealing with adulterated food in general. Further emphasis on adulteration was placed in the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), though EMA again is not explicitly defined, leaving the definition broad and open to interpretation, creating confusion as various organizations and groups propose their own definitions.
For the purposes of this post, we'll be using the working definition to maintain consistency.
It's difficult to answer this question exactly, a point that even the FDA readily admits.
Quantifying the exact cost of food fraud is a big challenge:
Even with all of these challenges, it's clear food fraud is a big problem with a big cost: financially, and in the number of lives impacted.
The E.U.'s Knowledge Center for Food Fraud and Quality (KC-FFQ) has seen similar results in its monthly Food Fraud Summary reports, though it doesn't maintain a comprehensive aggregate measure.
Given economic and production conditions, it's likely food fraud will continue to rise due to:
With the rise of food fraud, manufacturers have to make food fraud prevention a top priority. Especially after the passage of FSMA and its Foreign Supplier Verification Program (FSVP), which can make U.S. manufacturers liable for food fraud perpetrated by their vendors, as well as the Food Defense Rule.
Preventing food fraud is challenging, but there are proven and effective steps every manufacturer should take right now:
Food fraud is a serious problem. It calls for a serious solution. If you're ready to get serious about food fraud prevention in your facilities, contact AIB International about our Food Defense and Food Fraud Prevention services.